Facebook privacy pageThis morning I stumbled upon (in the un-trademarked sense of the phrase) this article on Search Engine Watch, German State Bans Facebook Pages, Like Buttons. The German Independent Center for Privacy Protection has required local (German) websites/businesses to take down their Facebook pages and remove Facebook “like” buttons from their own websites. Why?

ULD Commissioner Thilo Weichert for the northern German state of Schleswig-Holstein, said “the social network’s plugin, which allows Internet users to express their appreciation of something online, illegally puts together a profile of their Web habits.”

The complaint is that these plugins and pages track users for up to 2 years, recording users interactions with web pages, where they go beyond the initial page and what they do on all pages visited.

Search Engine Journal goes on to comment that this puts companies operating in Germany in an unfair disadvantage to their International competitors. As Frank Watson writes, “Having the government restrict this is not only dangerous, but restraint of trade. When the profits of businesses drop, they pay less taxes and employ less people, further depleting their own economy.”

While Facebook states that there are compliant with EU privacy laws, clearly these types of services social networking services should give us more pause, and this action on behalf of the German state begs the question: why isn’t there a U.S. group watching out for our privacy? Why is e-commerce more important then protecting my private information?

Earlier this month, Forbes published an article about this very issue: Facebook’s Privacy Issues Are Even Deeper Than We Knew. It’s not just what Facebook, or any other social media network, will do with your information that’s the problem, it’s what these platforms enable others to do with your information that is potentially more intrusive to you. As mentioned in the article, Facebook has essentially become a photo identification database.

As reported in various privacy and security outlets like Kashmir Hill’s Forbes blog and Paul Roberts at ThreatPost, and demonstrated at  last week’s Black Hat conference, the CMU researchers relied on just Facebook’s public profile information and off-the-shelf facial recognition software. Yet the CMU researchers were able to match Facebook users with their pictures on otherwise anonymous Match.com accounts. The researchers also had significant success taking pictures of experimental subjects and matching them to their Facebook profiles.

Drawing upon previous research, they were also relatively successful at guessing individuals’ Social Security numbers. From there, of course, it is just an automated click to your Google profile, LinkedIn work history, credit report, and many other slices of private information. (See the FAQ to the research here.)

Squirming in your chair yet? Just in case you’re not, consider this: Google’s Eric Schmidt is infamously quoted as saying that “Google policy is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it.” For clarification, he was talking about chip implants, not, say, Google Plus, but his sentiment has an especially eerie echo these days.

The U.S. policy on user/comsumer protection is clear: corporations are innocent until proven guilty, and the onus is on the user/consumer to prove foul play (if said user/consumer can afford to do so, that is). While the EU strives to protect consumers from toxic cosmetics and questionable Internet privacy policies, the U.S. offers us none of these protections, which encouraging over consumption and over-sharing.

So, be careful out there in cyberspace. Don’t take candy from a stranger, or Facebook…

Related posts:

Tags: , , , , , ,

I'm the guy who wrote what you just read. If you want to know more drop me a note.

3 Responses to “Beer, Bratwurst and Better Internet Privacy Policies” Subscribe

  1. Sarah Stup August 24, 2011 at 8:28 am #

    This morning Facebook announced some changes to their privacy policy: http://on.mash.to/q2eDvw

    I’m much more comfortable with having to approve tags in pictures, etc. so this seems like a positive change.

  2. dpopp August 24, 2011 at 12:20 pm #

    Interesting. It appears the revised Facebook policy moves them just back to the acceptable side of the creepy line. But as with the rise and fall of the surf that’s sure to change. Or is it? An article here which perhaps demonstrates that it is possible to freeze the technology pace (momentarily?). It hasn’t been the death knell of TI yet but unlike Facebook they have a diversified product line:

    http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/08/what-your-old-graphing-calculator-says-about-technology/244028/

  3. Sarah Stup August 24, 2011 at 2:03 pm #

    The Atlantic article made me miss my TI-83! That’s really interesting though, and maybe at some point technology in general starts to slow down? We want computers to be smaller and smaller, perhaps the tablet is the end of the line.

    But, I was thinking about this the other day (ever shifting technology) because my cell phone plans allows me to trade in my phone every two years at no cost. Should I do it because I can? There’s nothing wrong with my cell phone, and I don’t know what use it would be unless I donate it for someone else to use.

    Back to Facebook, you’re right. These changes just put them a shade on the non-creepy side. Will this be a constant dance – two steps forward, one step back?

Leave a Reply

Invaluable Understrappers

[UPDATED due to Clare Spark saying more about teachers unions in a post at 4:22 pm today.] One thing is […]

To Fart and Think of Dante

It’s hard not to love this paragraph from an essay on the poet Walter Lowenfels by Jim Burns. Lowenfels was […]

Tied to Your Shared Fate

[In which we conclude that Stubb's version of the monkey-rope is evil.] What is Equality? The state of being equal, […]

How Derogation Works

Which do you think is worse thing to hear come out of your child’s mouth? “Bitch” or “Fuck”? There are […]

The Impossible Principle

Melville wrote books that could be said to be about: Christian hypocrisy in the Marquesas, authoritarian coercion, military rule, torture, […]

The Spirit of America: The 13th Amendment

I must admit to an utter ignorance of the depths of duplicity written into the United States legal codes. I […]