<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Unexceptional, Unsurprising Success of America&#8217;s Bully Class</title>
	<atom:link href="http://btownerrant.com/2012/03/28/the-unexceptional-unsurprising-success-of-americas-bully-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://btownerrant.com/2012/03/28/the-unexceptional-unsurprising-success-of-americas-bully-class/</link>
	<description>Where Commoners Rant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 23:55:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby V</title>
		<link>http://btownerrant.com/2012/03/28/the-unexceptional-unsurprising-success-of-americas-bully-class/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btownerrant.com/?p=4014#comment-837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much of American culture is based on dominance. I would like to say that this especially true for contemporary American culture, but I don&#039;t really believe it. I just wrote and deleted two different paragraphs trying to contrast contemporary qualities of dominance with historical qualities. I can&#039;t do it; in the end it just seems the same. Maybe in the past a veneer of etiquette and civility made dominance and submission look a bit different. Self control is one of those passe virtues that Americans have pretty much dispensed with - believe me, I attended a middle school band performance last night and the behavior of a large portion of both children and adults in the audience was amazing. I think maybe in situations where people depend on smaller social groups - whether that&#039;s small towns, neighborhoods, trade associations, or whatever - they are freer to be less self absorbed. Interesting to consider that the elevation of the self does not produce greater freedom.

You&#039;ve probably already seen the following BBC documentary, but if you haven&#039;t, I HIGHLY recommend it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhxfArTAcfM

&quot;The Century of the Self&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of American culture is based on dominance. I would like to say that this especially true for contemporary American culture, but I don&#8217;t really believe it. I just wrote and deleted two different paragraphs trying to contrast contemporary qualities of dominance with historical qualities. I can&#8217;t do it; in the end it just seems the same. Maybe in the past a veneer of etiquette and civility made dominance and submission look a bit different. Self control is one of those passe virtues that Americans have pretty much dispensed with &#8211; believe me, I attended a middle school band performance last night and the behavior of a large portion of both children and adults in the audience was amazing. I think maybe in situations where people depend on smaller social groups &#8211; whether that&#8217;s small towns, neighborhoods, trade associations, or whatever &#8211; they are freer to be less self absorbed. Interesting to consider that the elevation of the self does not produce greater freedom.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve probably already seen the following BBC documentary, but if you haven&#8217;t, I HIGHLY recommend it:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhxfArTAcfM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhxfArTAcfM</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The Century of the Self&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
